Results 1 to 3 of 3
Like Tree9Likes
  • 6 Post By Mujibar
  • 3 Post By Leeshor

Thread: Samsung Double: Samsung & Apple Back to Court; USPTO Rules Apple's 381 Patent Invalid

  1. #1
    Administrator dgstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Member #
    321 times
    0 Post(s)

    Samsung Double: Samsung & Apple Back to Court; USPTO Rules Apple's 381 Patent Invalid

    We haven't heard any Samsung vs. Apple news in quite some time (and that may be a good thing), but we have a couple of stories worth sharing today. First, last week Samsung made a risky move and took Apple back to court to reassess the damages award from the big case of last year. Even though the previous $1 Billion+ award was reduced to about $600 Million already, there is more at stake here than just money. Legal precedents over patents and how those patents are handled by the court system are the real issue here. This made it worthwhile to Samsung to risk taking Apple back to court for a whole new trial.

    The reason this is a risk for them is because it is possible the original damage award could be reinstated, and Samsung could end up paying a lot more. There is even a chance the damage award could end up larger than the first $1.05 Billion dollar figure. Of course, Samsung is aware of this and is confident they can make a better argument than they did before which will end up in their favor. As it turns out, there may be more strategy involved than was immediately obvious. That leads into the second part of today's news.

    Not long ago we shared a story that the USPTO made a preliminary ruling declaring that Apple's '381 patent was invalid. This is one of the primary patents in the fight between Samsung and Apple and could cause a massive reversal of most of the damage award. Basically, the jury found that 21 Samsung devices infringed patent 381, and awarded damages for 18 of them. It turns out the USPTO just confirmed today that the '381 patent from Apple is invalid. This was a "Final Office Action" from the USPTO and is the end of the process, unless Apple attempts to appeal the USPTO's decision.

    In the mean-time, now that Apple and Samsung are back in trial for a damage recalculation, Samsung should be able to use this during the proceedings as a major trump card in their hand to get the damages reduced and a more favorable patent precedent outcome awarded. To be clear, the favorable outcome is far more important to Samsung than the cash. Most companies would have already folded and just paid the fine, but Samsung sees the bigger picture in the future and is fighting for more than just a meager billion dollars.

    More and more, it is looking like things will likely turn out much better for Samsung than originally thought.

    Source: AndroidAuthority 1 & 2


  3. #2
    Senior Member Mujibar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Member #
    224 times
    1 Post(s)
    Shouldn't the iPhone in that pic be smaller than the S3? It's obviously not to scale.
    tweebee, Jeffrey, Leeshor and 3 others like this.

  4. #3
    Senior Member Leeshor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Norcoss, GA
    Member #
    1411 times
    35 Post(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mujibar View Post
    Shouldn't the iPhone in that pic be smaller than the S3? It's obviously not to scale.
    Apple artist at work.
    jwalz, tweebee and Mujibar like this.
    Samsung Galaxy S 10.5 - SGH-i337 on AT&T - and LG G4

    Printing and file transfer tips
    WiFi connection tips. (modified 7/26/13)
    Current versions of Android don't support Flash player, try Puffin or Flashfox as an alternative browser.

Remove Ads


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

  1. Hilarious UK Commercial Pokes Fun at Apple and Mobile Gadgets in General
    By dgstorm in forum Galaxy S4 News & Site News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-28-2013, 09:38 AM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-12-2013, 02:06 PM

Search tags for this page

There are currently no search engine referrals.
Click on a term to search our site for related topics.